![]() “I am satisfied there is every prospect that the defendant will continue to flout orders of the court unless coerced into obeying them,” the Judge said, as he claimed that it is “necessary” to show “the court is not to be trifled with.” that Rene Eichenberger left VIVA over a year ago and that “he has an agenda to damage the firm, and is hostile to us which is why he is gone”.In a ruling earlier this month, High Court judge Mr Justice Kerr said Meyer had been “cynical” in breaching the High Court’s orders, as he claimed the proceedings had shown her “to be a selfish and untrustworthy person.” ![]() also said Meyer had asked them to sign non-disclosure agreements, as they claimed the contracts Meyer’s former employees signed have prevented them from speaking in public.Julie Meyer has told City A.M. that in many cases, the legal costs of pursuing Meyer, and seeking to reclaim any losses through the courts, ends up being more costly than any money lost to the businesswoman through any initial investment. Lightfoot claims that part of the reason Meyer has succeeded in her ventures is due to the fact that many of those who have been “hoodwinked” by the entrepreneur choose to take the financial hit, rather than suffer the reputational damage that would come about by making their dealings with Meyer public. Her reputation is earned and well-deserved,” wrote Rene Eichenberger. ![]() “I learned through direct, personal association that the risks of any business association with Julie Meyer are in fact far greater than any potential rewards. An email sent by a former business partner of Meyer to friends last year said that he had resigned as Chairman of VIVA Investment Partners – Meyer’s equity fund – due to Meyer’s behaviour.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |